SAT . WHITE HOUSE BOUND: President Trump praises the LA Dodgers for their epic World Series win against the Toronto Blue Jays.
In the city once known as the “capital” of the American democratic movement – New York City – a dramatic political development is gradually unfolding: an organization belonging to the city’s Young Republicans is promoting an extremely rare strategy: preventing the leading candidate for the position of Mayor from being officially sworn in on January 1, despite the fact that this person is leading in the race.
The candidate that NYYRC is targeting is Zohran Mamdani – a prominent figure of the Democratic Party, capable of becoming Mayor of New York (if elected).
The underlying reason: NYYRC cites Article 3 of the 14th Amendment – the US Constitution (enacted after the Civil War) – which stipulates: those who “engage in insurrection or rebellion” or “aid the enemy” will be barred from holding public office.
The NYYRC believes that some of Mamdani’s past statements — such as calling for “resistance” against ICE — could be seen as aiding an extreme form of “resistance,” and that they want to invoke the prohibition.
The NYYRC doesn’t just want Mamdani to not take office, but has two options: a) disqualify him or block him from appearing on the ballot, or b) declare him ineligible if he wins.
gnews.besttopixs.com
House Republicans are “following” this idea, preparing a bill to declare Mamdani ineligible under the “insurrection clause” — but they would have to overcome many hurdles: a slim majority in the House (219-213) and even if passed, they face the possibility of being challenged by the General Assembly (Senate) or the courts.
This is more than just a political case – it’s symbolic, raising the question: Who controls the people’s right to take office? If a person who wins a majority of the vote can still be “ousted” through a constitutional provision originally reserved for civil war, the precedent could pave the way for similar actions in the future.
This is notable
The state of Colorado used a similar approach last time to try to remove Donald Trump from the ballot – but the Supreme Court rejected it, stressing that the implementation is up to Congress, not just the state
New York – one of the most influential cities in the US – so the possibility of a candidate being prevented from taking office would be a big “ringer” not only for locals but also for political observers nationwide.
On the public side: this story raises many questions: what law allows “ousting” a candidate who has won? Are people deprived of their right to choose if the legal system intervenes?
🔮 The Future Scenario
If Mr. Mamdani wins and NYYRC and its Republican allies pursue the bill: we could see a lengthy legal process – litigation, constitutional debate, public backlash.
If he fails or withdraws: this flashpoint could still leave its mark – it will go down in history as an example of the use of the “insurrection clause” in peacetime.
And regardless of the outcome – this New York origin could become a “model” for other countries/states that intend to use a similar tool to control the winner’s right to take office.
Conclusion: This story is not just a “political joke” – it is a naval battle between democratic electoral rights and the constitutional rights of Congress/the law. At the center of the game: a front-runner, a young party organization trying to block his inauguration, and a 150-year-old constitutional provision being resurfaced. It promises to be dramatic — and all eyes are on New York.
