dq. “They Couldn’t Define a Woman — You Expect Them to Define a Terrorist?!” Greg Gutfeld Rips Democrats in Fiery Rant About Narco-Terrorists
In one of his most explosive monologues of the season, Fox News host Greg Gutfeld ignited a storm of controversy after blasting Democrats for their reaction to the deaths of several narco-terrorists targeted in recent U.S. operations. Speaking with his trademark mix of sarcasm and outrage, Gutfeld accused Democratic leaders of being unable to address national security threats with seriousness or clarity.
“You don’t have to listen to these people,” he declared on his primetime show. “They couldn’t define a woman — you expect them to define a terrorist!?”
The line, delivered with the comedic bite Gutfeld is known for, immediately sparked applause from his audience and shock from critics online. But he didn’t stop there.
As he continued, Gutfeld mocked the shifting terminology he says Democrats use to soften or obscure harsh realities. “Call them what you want,” he said. “I mean, you call a woman a ‘birthing person.’ You call a felon a ‘carceral individual.’ What are you gonna call a drug dealer? A pharmaceutical entrepreneur?”
His monologue took aim at what he framed as a broader linguistic and ideological disconnect between Democratic rhetoric and real-world dangers. Gutfeld argued that attempting to re-label criminals does nothing to deter violent cartels or the flow of fentanyl and narcotics into the United States.
“We don’t care!” he concluded sharply. “We’re still gonna shoot them.”
The remark — clearly intended as hyperbole and dark humor — set social media ablaze. Supporters praised Gutfeld for “saying what everyone is thinking,” while opponents condemned the segment as reckless and inflammatory. Prominent commentators debated whether the host’s critique highlighted legitimate frustrations over border enforcement or merely added fuel to an already polarized political climate.
Democratic lawmakers, while not responding directly to the rant, have repeatedly emphasized the need for coordinated international law enforcement strategies rather than escalated military-style responses to drug trafficking networks. Advocacy groups also warned against framing complex crises with oversimplified or violent rhetoric.
Still, Gutfeld’s comments resonated with viewers who believe federal policy has grown too timid or overly concerned with terminology rather than outcomes. The moment became yet another flashpoint in the ongoing cultural and political clash over crime, borders, and national identity.
What’s undeniable is that Gutfeld’s monologue — sharp, provocative, and unapologetically confrontational — has kept the debate burning long after the cameras stopped rolling.
