doem Why the Backlash Against Billie Eilish? Because Speaking the Truth About Billionaires Is Still Taboo
What exactly went down with Billie Eilish at the Wall Street Journal Magazine Innovator Awards last week? The incident offers a perfect snapshot of today’s media environment — full of instant information, hot takes, and predictable outrage.
Discover more
Sports commentary podcast
Portable speakers
News analysis newsletters
Kansas City news
Online news archive
Sports statistics service
Political campaign memorabilia
Sports betting guides
Television
Streamed
You can easily find every detail: host Stephen Colbert’s exact words as he introduced Eilish and announced that the 23-year-old pop star was donating $11.5 million (£8.8m) to support efforts against food insecurity and the climate crisis. Then came Eilish’s acceptance speech, in which she reflected:
“We’re in a time right now where the world is really, really bad and really dark, and people need empathy and help more than ever, especially in our country.”
But it was her next comment that lit up the internet:
Discover more
News aggregator website
Financial news reports
MUSIC
Sports statistics service
Political campaign memorabilia
Sports commentary podcast
Public relations services
NFL team merchandise
Social media monitoring tools
Business news trends
“Love you all, but there’s a few people in here who have a lot more money than me. If you’re a billionaire, why are you a billionaire? No hate, but yeah, give your money away, shorties.”
Soon after, headlines spread claiming that Mark Zuckerberg, attending the event while his wife Priscilla Chan received an award, appeared visibly unamused — reportedly declining to clap. Online sleuths then began dissecting Eilish’s use of “shorties”: was it a playful nickname, a term of endearment, or a jab at Zuckerberg’s (and Jeff Bezos’s) 5’7″ height?
Predictably, the backlash rolled in. “Like many Gen Zers,” one Sky News Australia presenter scoffed, “she sounds like a bit of a socialist — even though she’s sitting on millions herself.” The host then pivoted to Zohran Mamdani, New York City’s new mayor, pointing out that his support supposedly comes from “high-income earners.”
Discover more
Investigative journalism documentaries
Political campaign memorabilia
News aggregator apps
Celebrity news gossip
Celebrity biography books
Sports betting guides
Online news archive
television
Sports statistics service
Cam Heyward updates
And so the unwritten rules of billionaire criticism are once again enforced:
- You’re not allowed to question obscene wealth if you have any money of your own.
- If you’re in politics, you can’t even be supported by wealthy people.
There’s no clear threshold for being “poor enough” to speak out. You could work minimum wage, but if you’re educated or come from a middle-class background, that’s still too privileged. You could even give away every cent you earn — yet if your words carry influence, you’re still considered part of the elite.
Of course, there are contradictions everywhere. A self-made millionaire from a working-class background is still allowed to use that identity to defend wealth, but someone with empathy for others is accused of hypocrisy. Still, the larger question remains: if the only people “qualified” to criticize billionaires are those with nothing, who wrote those rules in the first place?
We talk endlessly about billionaires — their companies, their politics, their influence — yet rarely ask the most basic question: should billionaires exist at all? Many across the political spectrum, not just Gen Z or New York progressives, agree that extreme wealth harms democracy, suppresses wages, manipulates public opinion, and warps social priorities. Their philanthropy often doubles as image control, and some seem more interested in surviving the apocalypse than preventing it.
Yet we stop short of the obvious conclusion: maybe the very idea of holding a billion dollars is inherently wrong.
Discover more
News subscription service
Urgent news alerts
Investigative journalism documentaries
Breaking sports deals
TV streaming services
Public relations services
NFL team merchandise
Political campaign memorabilia
Celebrity news gossip
Breaking news alerts
And now, with one offhand remark, Billie Eilish has dragged that forbidden idea into the spotlight. For a while, it seemed that bold political statements from young female pop stars had peaked — that Charli XCX’s Brat, which redefined womanhood through chaos, pleasure, and defiance, was the final word. But it turns out, that was just the beginning.
