doem HuffPost Turns ‘Your Mom’ Diss From White House Into 66% Membership Surge in One Day
A recent interaction between a HuffPost correspondent and the White House press office, characterized by a juvenile retort, was leveraged by the news organization into a remarkably successful membership campaign. The publisher reported a 66 percent increase in new reader contributions in a single day after a text exchange involving White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt went viral. The incident highlights a contentious media environment and a news outlet’s agile strategy to turn a viral moment into tangible support.
The events were set in motion on October 17, when veteran political journalist Shirish Dáte sought information for a story. Dáte, a correspondent for HuffPost, contacted the White House to ask who had suggested Budapest as the location for a proposed meeting between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Rather than a formal response or a “no comment,” the reply from Leavitt was a terse text message: “Your mom did.”
Minutes later, a second message from another administration official reinforced the dismissive tone. White House communications director Steven Cheung sent Dáte a text that simply read: “Your mom.”
Dáte subsequently included the exchange in an article, and the unconventional response from two White House officials quickly gained traction across social media platforms. As the insult circulated widely online, Leavitt offered a follow-up response “for context,” but by then, HuffPost’s marketing department had already identified an opportunity.
A Marketing Coup
The news outlet acted swiftly, launching a targeted membership drive that directly referenced the incident. A bold banner appeared on the HuffPost website with the slogan: “MAGA Makes ‘Your Mom’ Jokes. We Make Headlines.” The pitch continued with a clear value statement, telling potential members, “Serious questions deserve better than middle school humor.”
The strategy proved highly effective. A spokeswoman for the company confirmed to The New York Times on Wednesday that the campaign led to a 66 percent spike in memberships in one day. By framing the exchange as a matter of journalistic seriousness versus political flippancy, HuffPost successfully converted public indignation into financial support for its work.
The Reporter’s Perspective
In an interview with Erik Wemple, a media reporter for the Times, Dáte expressed his astonishment at the nature of the White House’s reply. He placed the exchange in the context of the gravity of his reporting, which involved the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
“I was kind of like, this is a serious war that’s going on that has killed tens of thousands of Ukrainians in their homes,” Dáte stated. “And then your response is, ‘Your mom’?”
Having covered national politics for decades, Dáte appeared to take the personal slight in stride. He also commented on his relationship with his readership, acknowledging their likely opposition to the current administration. “I would guess that our core audience does not like Donald Trump for a variety of reasons,” he said. “And I hope my stories have informed them as to why they might oppose him.”
A Pattern of Acrimony
The “your mom” incident was not an isolated case of friction between Dáte and the administration’s communications staff. Officials have demonstrated a history of combativeness toward the reporter, whose outlet has maintained a critical stance on the administration.
Following the publication of the New York Times profile, Dáte took to social media to share further examples of hostile interactions. In one instance, while seeking comment for an article concerning White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, Dáte was told to “stop harassing him.”
In another exchange, which the Times had described more vaguely as “expletive-laden,” Dáte revealed the full text. The messages showed that a White House staffer had called him a “moron” and a “little fcking btch.”
Dáte provided his own commentary on the severity of such language, noting in a tweet that this behavior would have significant professional repercussions in other environments. He asserted that in previous administrations or in the “corporate world,” such conduct would get the staffers “fired.” This context suggests a broader pattern of unprofessional communication from certain White House officials when dealing with members of the press they view as adversarial. The viral success of HuffPost’s campaign demonstrates how such moments can be repurposed, turning an instance of dismissive communication into a rallying point for journalistic support.
