ss 🔥“YOU FOOLS, DON’T TELL ME I DON’T LOVE MY COUNTRY JUST BECAUSE I WANT AUSTRALIA TO BELONG TO REAL AUSTRALIANS!” – Pauline Hanson explodes onto the Australian political scene with a daring $150 billion “Australia First” plan, the boldest of the decade! This proposal includes cutting immigration to zero within five years, completely banning foreigners from owning land and property, and diverting funds from multicultural programs to building border walls and increasing maritime patrols. Just 72 hours after its announcement, support for the One Nation party skyrocketed to 25%, surpassing the Greens and threatening the ruling Coalition’s position in rural states

Pauline Hanson Unveils $150 Billion “Australia First” Plan – Bold Proposal to Cut Immigration to Zero, Ban Foreign Land Ownership, and Redirect Funds Sparks Massive Surge in One Nation Support

Pauline Hanson has once again thrust herself into the center of Australia’s political storm with a daring $150 billion “Australia First” plan, described as the boldest policy proposal of the decade.

In a fiery speech that has electrified the nation, the One Nation leader exploded with passion: “You fools, don’t tell me I don’t love my country just because I want Australia to belong to real Australians!” The plan, unveiled on January 11, 2026, calls for drastic measures including slashing immigration to zero within five years, banning foreigners from owning land and property, and diverting funds from multicultural programs to build border walls and boost maritime patrols.

Just 72 hours after the announcement, support for One Nation has skyrocketed to 25%, surpassing the Greens and posing a serious threat to the ruling Coalition in rural states.

Hanson’s proposal comes at a time of heightened debate over immigration, national identity, and economic pressures in Australia

With net migration hitting record levels under the Albanese government – over 740,000 arrivals in the last financial year – many Australians are voicing concerns about housing shortages, job competition, and cultural shifts.

Hanson tapped into this sentiment with her unapologetic rhetoric, positioning the plan as a “rescue mission” for the nation’s future. “We’re being sold out by elites who care more about global agendas than Aussie families,” she declared, her voice echoing through a packed rally in Brisbane.

“This plan puts Australia first – zero immigration for five years to let our country breathe, no more foreign ownership stealing our land, and every dollar from wasteful multicultural handouts going to real security: walls, patrols, and protecting our way of life.”

The $150 billion funding would be sourced from reallocating budgets, including slashing foreign aid, ending certain environmental grants, and redirecting multicultural integration programs. Hanson argues this will create jobs for Australians, ease housing pressures, and strengthen border defenses.

“Why are we funding programs that divide us when we could be building walls to protect us?” she asked, drawing cheers from the crowd.

Critics, however, slam the plan as “xenophobic” and “economically reckless,” warning it could isolate Australia internationally and harm industries reliant on migrant labor like agriculture and healthcare.

The announcement has triggered an immediate political earthquake. Polls conducted 72 hours post-reveal show One Nation’s support jumping to 25% nationwide, a surge from single digits, particularly in rural Queensland, New South Wales, and Western Australia where the Coalition holds sway.

This boost threatens Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s grip, with Labor insiders admitting the plan resonates with voters feeling the pinch of high migration-driven inflation and housing costs. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton called it “populist pandering,” but privately, Coalition strategists are scrambling to counter the appeal in key electorates.

Social media has exploded with reactions.

Hashtags like #AustraliaFirst and #HansonPlan trending as supporters hail it a “bold vision for sovereignty,” while opponents label it “racist rhetoric.” One viral post from a rural farmer read: “Finally, someone fighting for real Aussies – zero immigration means jobs and homes for us!” A counter-post from a multicultural advocate countered: “This divides us – Australia thrives on diversity, not walls.” The debate has divided families, workplaces, and online forums, with millions engaging in heated discussions.

Hanson’s rise isn’t new – the One Nation founder has long been a polarizing figure, championing anti-immigration stances since the 1990s. But this plan marks her most comprehensive policy blueprint yet, blending economic nationalism with cultural protectionism.

It proposes a five-year immigration freeze except for highly skilled workers in critical shortages, a total ban on foreign property purchases (including by permanent residents), and massive investments in border infrastructure inspired by U.S.-style walls.

“Our land belongs to Australians – not foreign investors turning our cities into ghost towns for the rich,” Hanson said.

Economists are divided on feasibility. Some warn the $150 billion redirection could trigger budget shortfalls in education and health, while others argue cutting foreign aid (currently $4 billion annually) and multicultural grants could free up funds without harm.

Immigration experts caution a zero-net policy could shrink the workforce, exacerbating aging population issues, but Hanson counters: “We’re not against skilled migrants – we’re against uncontrolled floods that strain our services and dilute our culture.”

The Albanian government has dismissed the plan as “extreme and unworkable,” with Immigration Minister Andrew Giles stating: “This is divisive fear-mongering – migration drives growth and innovation.” But Labor’s response has been criticized as tone-deaf, with Albanese facing internal pressure from backbenchers in migration-heavy seats.

“The PM needs to address the real concerns – housing, jobs, infrastructure – or One Nation will eat our lunch in the regions,” one Labor MP confided anonymously.

The surge in One Nation support has real electoral implications. In rural states like Queensland, where Hanson’s base is strong, the party could siphon votes from the Coalition, potentially flipping seats in the next federal election. Analysts predict a fragmented parliament if the trend holds, forcing coalitions or minority governments.

“Hanson’s tapping into a silent majority tired of high migration without benefits,” one pollster noted.

As the debate rages, Hanson remains defiant: “This is Australia First – for our kids, our culture, our future. The elites can waffle, but the people are waking up.” With petitions supporting the plan gaining traction and protests planned, the political landscape is shifting.

Will Albanese adapt, or will Hanson’s bold vision reshape Australian policy? The nation watches as the “Australia First” storm brews.