A storm is brewing in the heart of Washington, D.C. — and Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) is right at the center of it. Her latest move has sent shockwaves through Capitol Hill: a demand for a total ban on dual citizens serving in the U.S. Congress.
Her message is blunt, patriotic, and impossible to ignore:
“The ONLY people who should be allowed to serve in Congress are American citizens!”
With those words, Luna has ignited a national firestorm over loyalty, security, and what it truly means to serve the United States. Supporters hail her as a fearless defender of American integrity — critics call it a political grenade that could upend Washington as we know it.
🇺🇸 A Call for Unquestioned Allegiance
Luna’s campaign, dubbed a “Loyalty Test for Congress,” is built on one defining principle: divided citizenship means divided loyalty.
The Florida Republican insists that anyone making decisions about America’s future must hold one flag, one passport, and one allegiance — to the United States alone.
Her push is part of a broader “America First” effort aimed at cleansing Congress of potential foreign influence — and it’s quickly gaining traction across the country.
⚖️ The Legal Loophole in Washington
Under the U.S. Constitution, members of Congress only need to meet three simple requirements:
✅ Minimum age
✅ A certain number of years as a U.S. citizen
✅ Residency in the state they represent
Nowhere does it say you can’t hold another citizenship.
That’s the loophole Luna wants to close — permanently.
Lawmakers are split into two camps on how to handle it:
- Transparency First:
- The Dual Citizenship Disclosure Act (H.R. 7484, by Rep. Tim Burchett, R-TN) would force lawmakers to publicly declare if they hold any foreign citizenship.
- Luna’s own Dual Loyalty Disclosure Act (H.R. 2356) takes this further, requiring every federal candidate to reveal dual citizenship in their official campaign filings.
- Zero Tolerance:
- The Disqualifying Dual Loyalty Act of 2025, introduced by Rep. Randy Fine (R-FL), goes nuclear: no dual citizens can serve in Congress — period.
- Current members with a second nationality would have to renounce it or step down.
These proposals could rewrite the rules of who gets to wield power in America — and expose those who might have hidden ties abroad.
🕵️ The Argument: Loyalty vs. Influence
Luna’s case is simple — and explosive.
She argues that holding dual citizenship means owing allegiance to two nations. In a world of spy scandals, global conflicts, and cyber threats, she says the risk of split loyalties is unacceptable.
Supporters claim the ban would:
- Protect National Security: Prevent potential manipulation by foreign powers.
- Restore Public Trust: Reassure Americans that their leaders serve only U.S. interests.
To them, this is not politics — it’s patriotism.
⚔️ A Defining Battle for Washington
Critics call it “extreme nationalism.” Supporters call it “long overdue.” Either way, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna has drawn a line in the sand.
Her fiery speeches and unapologetic tone are forcing a conversation few in D.C. want to have:
Should anyone with dual citizenship be allowed to shape America’s future?
With a new bill on the floor and tensions rising, Luna’s push could become one of the most controversial political battles of 2025.
Her message to Washington is crystal clear — and impossible to ignore:
“You can’t serve two masters. Choose one: America or not at all.”
🔥 Bottom Line:
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna’s fight to ban dual citizens from Congress isn’t just about law — it’s about loyalty. And as the debate intensifies, Washington’s power players may soon have to answer a question they’ve long avoided:
Where does your allegiance truly lie?
