4t TRUMP’S PENTAGON STRIKES BACK: Pete Hegseth Just Opened a Military Investigation and Threatens COURT-MARTIAL Against Senator Mark Kelly for One Video Telling Generals to “Disobey Illegal Orders”
BREAKING: Pete Hegseth has launched a retaliatory investigation into Senator Mark Kelly, threatening a court-martial over “serious allegations of misconduct” related to a video in which Kelly urged U.S. troops to disobey illegal orders—a stance that has ignited fierce political controversy.
In a public statement on Twitter, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth condemned the video produced by the so-called “Seditious Six,” calling it “despicable, reckless, and false,” and accused the group of encouraging military personnel to disregard commanders’ orders, thereby undermining military discipline and safety. While five of the six lawmakers featured in the video fall outside Pentagon jurisdiction, Kelly—a retired Navy Commander—is still subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), making him uniquely vulnerable to military disciplinary action.
The Pentagon confirmed it has initiated a thorough review of these allegations, stating the process could lead to Kelly’s recall to active duty and court-martial proceedings, or other administrative actions. This investigation follows intense backlash from former President Donald Trump, who branded Kelly and the other Democrats “traitors” and called for their arrest and trial, escalating the rhetoric to unprecedented extremes. Trump even shared an AI-generated video depicting the lawmakers in jail, exemplifying his fierce opposition to any challenge to his authority.
Senator Kelly, a former combat pilot and astronaut, received broad support from fellow Democrats and veterans who defend his call for troops to uphold the Constitution above all else. Senator Ruben Gallego and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, among others, criticized the investigation as a blatant abuse of power by the Trump-aligned Pentagon leadership and a dangerous effort to intimidate those who stand by constitutional principles.
This political showdown highlights a fundamental tension: one side demanding blind loyalty to an individual leader—regardless of legality—and the other insisting the military’s allegiance must remain to the U.S. Constitution. Kelly’s message serves as a critical reminder that the armed forces are pledged to uphold the nation’s laws and democratic foundations, not to enforce illegal or unconstitutional commands.
The aggressive defense of Kelly and the fierce condemnation of the Pentagon probe underscore a pivotal moment in American democracy, emphasizing that no authority, even at the highest levels, is above the law. The outcome of this investigation will signal much about the future of civil-military relations and the protection of constitutional rights within the armed services.
In short, Pete Hegseth’s escalation with court-martial threats against Senator Mark Kelly has sparked a fierce battle over constitutional loyalty, military discipline, and political power—one that continues to unfold amid a nation sharply divided over leadership, law, and democracy.
