4t MTG’S EPSTEIN NUCLEAR STRIKE: Marjorie Taylor Greene Vows to Read EVERY NAME From Jeffrey Epstein’s Secret Client List LIVE on House Floor — Where NO ONE Can Sue Her for Defamation!

Marjorie Taylor Greene has ignited a political firestorm with her bold promise to publicly reveal the names of Jeffrey Epstein’s secret clients—live on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives. Shielded by the Constitution’s “speech and debate clause,” Greene says she plans to read every name made available to her aloud during a House session, a move she declares no one can legally block or sue her for defamation.

Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender, died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges linked to his infamous sex trafficking ring. Ever since, there has been intense public demand and legal pressure for the full disclosure of the thousands of documents and names connected to Epstein’s network of powerful associates.

Greene, a conservative Republican from Georgia, emerged as one of the most vocal advocates for further transparency regarding Epstein’s clients. Alongside other lawmakers such as Rep. Thomas Massie and Rep. Ro Khanna, she supports a discharge petition aimed at compelling the Department of Justice to release the complete files related to Epstein’s criminal case. The petition, if successful, would force a floor vote in the House.

What makes Greene’s plan particularly combustible is her willingness to personally take the stage and read out loud the names alleged to be involved with Epstein. She conveyed this commitment during press conferences with Epstein survivors present, emphasizing that survivors have expressed fear of litigation should the names be exposed publicly. However, the speech and debate clause under Article 1, Section 6 of the U.S. Constitution grants members of Congress immunity from lawsuits related to statements made in the course of official legislative activities.

“This is about justice for the victims,” Greene said at a recent event. “If survivors are willing to give me the names, I’ll walk into that Capitol and read every damn name that abused these women. I can do that for them.” Her statement underscores both a defiant readiness to use congressional privilege and a desire to break the silence around this deep-seated scandal.

The move has drawn mixed reactions. Supporters praise Greene for championing accountability and transparency, viewing her potential disclosure as a long-overdue reckoning for the powerful elite allegedly implicated. Some Democrats and legal experts caution about potential complexities regarding privacy and ongoing investigations but acknowledge the constitutional protections Greene enjoys.

Greene’s action symbolizes a rift between demands for full disclosure and legal protections for survivors and accused individuals. Many survivors back this effort, arguing that releasing the names would empower victims and help shed light on systemic abuse often shielded by wealth and influence.

The Epstein files controversy remains a hot-button issue, raising larger questions about power dynamics, justice, and transparency in the United States. Greene’s nuclear strike on the House floor promises to deepen the national conversation as she stands poised to wield one of Congress’s most potent constitutional tools in the fight for justice.